Talk:Greater Johannesburg

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 November 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

South Africa: Municipalities Mid‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the municipalities task force.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Merge with Witwatersrand

There seems to be a lot of overlap between the two articles. Either some way of differentiating them needs to be found or they should be merged. It seems that they both refer to the same area, but I could be mistaken. 168.209.98.35 14:08, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As per the discussion on Talk:Witwatersrand, I have removed the merge notice.168.209.98.35 15:13, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to make more sense to merge with City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality --NJR ZA (talk) 08:43, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality

The is no official area called Greater Johannesburg and the information contained here seems to belong in City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality. See the Municipal Demarcation Board for current municipal information. --NJR ZA (talk) 08:51, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do not merge

The Witwatersrand is an un-PC name for the Greater Jo'burg area, dummy. In any case, Greater Jo'burg is not just the CoJ metro municipality. That's why this page is here: Johannesburg's de facto contiguous metro area should include both the East and West Rand. Go bond with your map book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.54.202.102 (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greater Johannesburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120118083352/http://www.looking4.co.za/johannesburg.htm to http://www.looking4.co.za/johannesburg.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:40, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Greater Johannesburg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Major rework to avoid deletion

Wikipedia:Deletion policy#Alternatives to deletion says improve the page if possible rather than deletion. This I have attempted, by rewriting only with statements backed by reliable sources. I hope that, by showing what the article can legitimately be, to inform the current AfD discussion. Anyone can help with this!

The following lists what I have removed, and why:

the map (File:Greater Johannesburg OpenStreetMap small.svg) - it was created from OpenStreetMap which doesn't recognise the name "Greater Johannesburg",
"see also ... Municipal Demarcation Board" - its website search finds nothing for Greater Johannesburg,
the 2007 Community Survey population figures - that survey didn't mention "Greater Johannesburg" (look eg here for the Gauteng report),
the Beavon paper "Nearer my Mall to Thee" - though mentioning "Greater Johannesburg", gives little insight into its definition other than also mentioning the Greater Johannesburg Metropolitan Council.
the 10,267,700 figure including Ekurhuleni, the West Rand, etc - I doubt the now defunct source (looking4.co.za) counts as reliable.

Batternut (talk) 00:49, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]